University of Massachusetts Amherst: Auerbach and Team Use Artificial Intelligence to Rank The Synthesizability Of Materials That Show Promise for Carbon Capture
Recently, the journal Digital Discovery published a study from an international research team including UMass Amherst chemistry professor Scott Auerbach that applied artificial intelligence (AI) to a long-standing problem in materials science – identifying structures within massive computer-generated databases that are good candidates for actual fabrication. Auerbach and coworkers focused their study on hypothetical zeolites, which show promise for capturing carbon dioxide emissions.
Zeolites are nanoporous crystals that have been utilized for more than 6 decades in a number of industrial processes, particularly in refining petroleum and separating chemical mixtures. While much effort has been put into identifying and synthesizing new zeolites for modern needs such as producing clean biofuels and capturing carbon dioxide, success has been largely theoretical. While massive databases of hypothetical zeolites have been generated containing millions of new framework structures, none has been made in the lab.
“This problem, which is known as the ‘zeolite conundrum,’ has severely limited the pace of the clean energy transition,” said Auerbach. “Finding the few hypothetical zeolites that can actually be synthesized in the lab is like finding a needle in a gigantic haystack.”
Auerbach and coworkers – Michele Ceriotti and Benjamin Helfrecht at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) in Lausanne, and Rocio Semino and Giovanni Pireddu at the Sorbonne University in Paris – developed an algorithm called the “sorting hat” that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to distinguish between the 255 already-synthesized zeolites and more than 300,000 hypothetical framework structures. They created a short list of hypothetical zeolites that are so similar to real ones that they are “misclassified” by the sorting hat as real materials – making them good candidates for actual synthesis.
“Ours is the first study to apply AI to the zeolite conundrum,“ said Auerbach. “All the previous studies are biased by preconceived ideas about what makes real zeolites real – we wanted to move away from such bias.”
After filtering their results by additional criteria, including the potential for stabilizing them during synthesis, the researchers proposed three leading hypothetical candidates for synthesis. Their analysis also categorized real zeolites into four compositional classes or “houses.” This partitioning into houses allowed the researchers to propose chemical compositions to pursue in the laboratory for making the hypothetical zeolites – like recipes for synthesis.
“As is the case for many synthetic tasks, making zeolites is a form of art, guided by experience, chemical intuition and serendipity,” the researchers said. “The zeolite sorting hat introduces data-driven techniques and rational design into the process of selecting candidates that we hope will accelerate the rate of discovery that will in turn, will improve the predictive capabilities of the model in a positive feedback mechanism that will progressively take the guesswork out of zeolite synthesis.”